Do you guys think that committing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4858
to branch-2.3 is still Ok? It is a small change that bring fixes broken
timeout behavior of DN to NN RPC.
We have been testing this fix on top of 2.0.6 for a long time now and it seems
to be a real help.
Appreciate the feedback on 2.3 scope. If it is too late then I will commit it
to trunk, branch-2.4 and branch-2 only.
Regards,
Cos
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 05:44PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> yep, the idea is to pull all of them out from branch2.3. things go back to
> normal then.
>
> thanks
>
> Alejandro
> (phone typing)
>
> > On Feb 6, 2014, at 17:39, Zhijie Shen <zs...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > Recently I brought 4 JIRAs to branch-2.3, which are MAPREDUCE-5743,
> > YARN-1628,
> > YARN-1661 and YARN-1689. Recall that we mark test failure fixes as blockers
> > for pior releases as closing to release, thus I brought to branch-2.3
> > MAPREDUCE-5743
> > and YARN-1628 that are the fixes for the test failure on 2.3.0, but didn't
> > marked them as blockers. Please let me know if I should do that.
> >
> > YARN-1661 is a fix for exit log of DS AppMaster, otherwise the exit log of
> > it will always be failure, which sounds a critical issue to me. Feel free
> > to pull it out if any objects.
> >
> > YARN-1689 is brought to branch-2.3 as YARN-1493 is still in this branch. It
> > fixes one bug caused by YARN-1493. Those should be included or excluded
> > together upon the decision.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zhijie
> >
> >
> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Sandy Ryza <sandy.r...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 to reverting those JIRAs from branch-2.3. As YARN-1689 is fixing a
> >> problem caused by YARN-1493 I think we can revert it in branch-2.3 as well.
> >>
> >> I think we should leave them in branch-2 for now. We can revert if 2.4 is
> >> imminent and they're holding it up, but hopefully the issues they caused
> >> will be fixed by then.
> >>
> >> -Sandy
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <t...@cloudera.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Robert,
> >>>
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> So it seems that YARN-1493 and YARN-1490 are introducing serious
> >>> regressions.
> >>>
> >>> I would propose to revert them and the follow up JIRAs from the 2.3
> >> branch
> >>> and keep working on them on trunk/branch-2 until the are stable (I would
> >>> even prefer reverting them from branch-2 not to block a 2.4 if they are
> >> not
> >>> ready in time).
> >>>
> >>> As I've mentioned before, the list of JIRAs to revert were:
> >>>
> >>> YARN-1493
> >>> YARN-1490
> >>> YARN-1166
> >>> YARN-1041
> >>> YARN-1566
> >>>
> >>> Plus 2 additional JIRAs committed since my email on this issue 2 days
> >> ago:
> >>>
> >>> *YARN-1661
> >>> *YARN-1689 (not sure if this JIRA is related in functionality to the
> >>> previous ones but it is creating conflicts).
> >>>
> >>> I think we should hold on continuing work on top of something that is
> >>> broken until the broken stuff is fixed.
> >>>
> >>> Quoting Arun, "Committers - Henceforth, please use extreme caution while
> >>> committing to branch-2.3. Please commit *only* blockers to 2.3."
> >>>
> >>> YARN-1661 & YARN-1689 are not blockers.
> >>>
> >>> Unless there are objections, I'll revert all these JIRAs from branch-2.3
> >>> tomorrow around noon and I'll update fixedVersion in the JIRAs.
> >>>
> >>> I'm inclined to revert them from branch-2 as well.
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Robert Kanter <rkan...@cloudera.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I think we should revert YARN-1490 from Hadoop 2.3 branch. I think it
> >>> was
> >>>> causing some strange behavior in the Oozie unit tests:
> >>>>
> >>>> Basically, we use a single MiniMRCluster and MiniDFSCluster across all
> >>> unit
> >>>> tests in a module. With YARN-1490 we saw that, regardless of test
> >> order,
> >>>> the last few tests would timeout waiting for an MR job to finish; on
> >>> slower
> >>>> machines, the entire test suite would timeout. Through some digging, I
> >>>> found that we were getting a ton of "Connection refused" Exceptions on
> >>>> LeaseRenewer talking to the NN and a few on the AM talking to the RM.
> >>>>
> >>>> After a bunch of investigation, I found that the problem went away once
> >>>> YARN-1490 was removed. Though I couldn't figure out the exact problem.
> >>>> Even though this occurred in unit tests, it does make me concerned
> >> that
> >>> it
> >>>> could indicate some bigger issue in a long-running real cluster (where
> >>>> everything isn't running on the same machine) that we haven't seen yet.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I have marked MAPREDUCE-5744 a blocker for 2.3. Committing it
> >> shortly.
> >>>> Will
> >>>>> pull it out of branch-2.3 if anyone objects.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Arpit Agarwal <
> >>> aagar...@hortonworks.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Merged HADOOP-10273 to branch-2.3 as r1565456.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Arpit Agarwal <
> >>>> aagar...@hortonworks.com
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> IMO HADOOP-10273 (Fix 'mvn site') should be included in 2.3.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I will merge it to branch-2.3 tomorrow PST if no one disagrees.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <
> >>>> t...@cloudera.com
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IMO YARN-1577 is a blocker, it is breaking unmanaged AMs in a
> >> very
> >>>> odd
> >>>>>>>> ways
> >>>>>>>> (to the point it seems un-deterministic).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I'd say eiher YARN-1577 is fixed or we revert
> >>>>>>>> YARN-1493/YARN-1490/YARN-1166/YARN-1041/YARN-1566 (almost clean
> >>>>> reverts)
> >>>>>>>> from Hadoop 2.3 branch before doing the release.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I've verified that after reverting those JIRAs things work fine
> >>> with
> >>>>>>>> unmanaged AMs.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Arun C Murthy <
> >>> a...@hortonworks.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I punted YARN-1444 to 2.4 since it's a long-standing issue.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Jian is away and I don't see YARN-1577 & YARN-1206 making much
> >>>>>> progress
> >>>>>>>>> till he is back; so I'm inclined to push both to 2.4 too. Any
> >>>>>>>> objections?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Looks like Daryn has both HADOOP-10301 & HDFS-4564 covered.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Overall, I'll try get this out in next couple of days if we
> >> can
> >>>>> clear
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> list.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Arun
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Arun C Murthy <
> >> a...@hortonworks.com
> >>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> An update. Per https://s.apache.org/hadoop-2.3.0-blockerswe
> >>>> are
> >>>>>> now
> >>>>>>>>> down to 5 blockers: 1 Common, 1 HDFS, 3 YARN.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Daryn (thanks!) has both the non-YARN covered. Vinod is
> >>> helping
> >>>>> out
> >>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>> the YARN ones.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Arun
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Arun C. Murthy
> >>>>>>>>> Hortonworks Inc.
> >>>>>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual
> >>> or
> >>>>>>>> entity to
> >>>>>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> >>>>>> confidential,
> >>>>>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>> reader
> >>>>>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >>>>> notified
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure
> >>> or
> >>>>>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
> >> you
> >>>> have
> >>>>>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the
> >> sender
> >>>>>>>> immediately
> >>>>>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Alejandro
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >>>>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> >>>> entity
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> >>> confidential,
> >>>>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> >>>> reader
> >>>>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> >>> notified
> >>>>> that
> >>>>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >>>>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
> >> have
> >>>>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> >>>>> immediately
> >>>>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Alejandro
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Zhijie Shen
> > Hortonworks Inc.
> > http://hortonworks.com/
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
