Let's extend this vote by another 2 days just in case Nicholas doesn't find time in his schedule today to comment.
He needs to withdraw his -1 before we can proceed. Colin On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: > +1 for the branch merge. I've reviewed all of the code in the branch, and > we have people now running this code in production scenarios. It is as > functional as the old version and way easier to set up/configure. > > -Todd > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@alumni.cmu.edu> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I think it's time to merge the HDFS-347 branch back to trunk. It's been > > under > > review and testing for several months, and provides both a performance > > advantage, and the ability to use short-circuit local reads without > > compromising system security. > > > > Previously, we tried to merge this and the objection was brought up that > we > > should keep the old, insecure short-circuit local reads around so that > > platforms for which secure SCR had not yet been implemented could use it > > (e.g. Windows). This has been addressed-- see HDFS-4538 for details. > > Suresh has also volunteered to maintain the insecure SCR code until > secure > > SCR can be implemented for Windows. > > > > Please cast your vote by EOD Monday 4/8. > > > > best, > > Colin > > > > > > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera >
