I'll do the needful after midnight tonight. It should take less than 
half-an-hour, and I'll send out the all clear after.

thanks,
Arun

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com>
> Date: March 26, 2012 7:31:21 PM PDT
> To: gene...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [RESULT] - [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
> 
> Thanks to all who voted.
> 
> Here are the counts:
> # Community (62 votes): {1 -> 14, 2 -> 4, 3 -> 38, 4 -> 5, 5 -> 1}
> # Binding (22 votes): {1 -> 2, 2 -> 1, 3 -> 15, 4 -> 4, 5 -> 0}
> 
> As a result, we seem to converge on option #3 with 15/22 binding votes (38/62 
> overall).
> 
> thanks,
> Arun
> 
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> 
>> We've discussed several options:
>> 
>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 
>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone 
>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. 
>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>> 
>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>> 
>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>> 
>> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>> 
>> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>> 
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>> 
> 
> 

--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/


Reply via email to