I'll do the needful after midnight tonight. It should take less than half-an-hour, and I'll send out the all clear after.
thanks, Arun Begin forwarded message: > From: Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> > Date: March 26, 2012 7:31:21 PM PDT > To: gene...@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: [RESULT] - [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x > > Thanks to all who voted. > > Here are the counts: > # Community (62 votes): {1 -> 14, 2 -> 4, 3 -> 38, 4 -> 5, 5 -> 1} > # Binding (22 votes): {1 -> 2, 2 -> 1, 3 -> 15, 4 -> 4, 5 -> 0} > > As a result, we seem to converge on option #3 with 15/22 binding votes (38/62 > overall). > > thanks, > Arun > > On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > >> We've discussed several options: >> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3. >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole. >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is. >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 >> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone >> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now. >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is. >> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus. >> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences. >> >> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding). >> >> The vote will run the normal 7 days. >> >> thanks, >> Arun >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote >> > > -- Arun C. Murthy Hortonworks Inc. http://hortonworks.com/