Owen, The question is whether this is a * Code Change, which requires Lazy consensus of active committers or a * Adoption of New Codebase, which needs Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members
Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes and no binding vetoes. If I am looking at the current bylaws, then it tells me this needs a vote. Did I miss anything? Konstantin On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > On Apr 26, 2011, at 11:34 PM, suresh srinivas wrote: > > >> 2. I assume that merging requires a vote. I am sure people who know > bylaws > >> better than I do will correct me if it is not true. > >> Did I miss the vote? > >> > > > > > > As regards to voting, since I was not sure about the procedure, I had > > consulted Owen about it. He had indicated that voting is not necessary. > If > > the right procedure is to call for voting, I will do so. Owen any > comments? > > Merging a branch back in doesn't require an explicit vote. It is just a > code commit. This discussion thread is enough to establish that there is > consensus in the dev community. > > -- Owen
