[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Lipcon resolved HDFS-1227.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Duplicate
Going to resolve this as invalid. If you can reproduce after HDFS-1186 is
committed, or provide a unit test, we can reopen.
> UpdateBlock fails due to unmatched file length
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-1227
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1227
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: data-node
> Affects Versions: 0.20-append
> Reporter: Thanh Do
>
> - Summary: client append is not atomic, hence, it is possible that
> when retrying during append, there is an exception in updateBlock
> indicating unmatched file length, making append failed.
>
> - Setup:
> + # available datanodes = 3
> + # disks / datanode = 1
> + # failures = 2
> + failure type = bad disk
> + When/where failure happens = (see below)
> + This bug is non-deterministic, to reproduce it, add a sufficient sleep
> before out.write() in BlockReceiver.receivePacket() in dn1 and dn2 but not dn3
>
> - Details:
> Suppose client appends 16 bytes to block X which has length 16 bytes at dn1,
> dn2, dn3.
> Dn1 is primary. The pipeline is dn3-dn2-dn1. recoverBlock succeeds.
> Client starts sending data to the dn3 - the first datanode in pipeline.
> dn3 forwards the packet to downstream datanodes, and starts writing
> data to its disk. Suppose there is an exception in dn3 when writing to disk.
> Client gets the exception, it starts the recovery code by calling
> dn1.recoverBlock() again.
> dn1 in turn calls dn2.getMetadataInfo() and dn1.getMetaDataInfo() to build
> the syncList.
> Suppose at the time getMetadataInfo() is called at both datanodes (dn1 and
> dn2),
> the previous packet (which is sent from dn3) has not come to disk yet.
> Hence, the block Info given by getMetaDataInfo contains the length of 16
> bytes.
> But after that, the packet "comes" to disk, making the block file length now
> becomes 32 bytes.
> Using the syncList (with contains block info with length 16 byte), dn1 calls
> updateBlock at
> dn2 and dn1, which will failed, because the length of new block info (given
> by updateBlock,
> which is 16 byte) does not match with its actual length on disk (which is 32
> byte)
>
> Note that this bug is non-deterministic. Its depends on the thread
> interleaving
> at datanodes.
> This bug was found by our Failure Testing Service framework:
> http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2010/EECS-2010-98.html
> For questions, please email us: Thanh Do (than...@cs.wisc.edu) and
> Haryadi Gunawi (hary...@eecs.berkeley.edu)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
