+1 Nicholas Sze
----- Original Message ---- > From: Stack <st...@duboce.net> > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Sent: Tue, February 2, 2010 10:22:50 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Commit HDFS-927 to both 0.20 and 0.21 branch? > > I'd like to open a vote on committing HDFS-927 to both hadoop branch > 0.20 and to 0.21. > > HDFS-927 "DFSInputStream retries too many times for new block > location" has an odd summary but in short, its a better HDFS-127 > "DFSClient block read failures cause open DFSInputStream to become > unusable". HDFS-127 is an old, popular issue that refuses to die. We > voted on having it committed to the 0.20 branch not too long ago, see > http://www.mail-archive.com/hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org/msg00401.html, > only it broke TestFsck (See http://su.pr/1nylUn) so it was reverted. > > High-level, HDFS-127/HDFS-927 is about fixing DFSClient so it a good > read cleans out the failures count (Previous failures 'stuck' though > there may have been hours of successful reads in betwixt). When > rolling hadoop 0.20.2 was proposed, a few fellas including myself > raised a lack of HDFS-127 as an obstacle. > > HDFS-927 has been committed to TRUNK. > > I'm +1 on committing to 0.20 and to 0.21 branches. > > Thanks for taking the time to take a look into this issue. > St.Ack
