On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <r...@ro-che.info> wrote:
> * David Barbour <dmbarb...@gmail.com> [2012-01-21 10:01:00-0800] > > As noted, IO is not strict in the value x, only in the operation that > > generates x. However, should you desire strictness in a generic way, it > > would be trivial to model a transformer monad to provide it. > > Again, that wouldn't be a monad transformer, strictly speaking, because > "monads" it produces violate the left identity law. > It meets the left identity law in the same sense as the Eval monad from Control.Strategies. http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/parallel/3.1.0.1/doc/html/src/Control-Parallel-Strategies.html#Eval That is, so long as values at each step can be evaluated to WHNF, it remains true that `return x >>= f` = f x. I did mess up the def of >>=. I think it should be: (StrictT op) >>= f = StrictT (op >>= \ x -> x `seq` runStrictT (f x)) But I'm not interested enough to actually pull out an interpreter and test... Regards, Dave
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
