My understanding is that blocking/redirection is to be done at the DNS level. In which case, there *is* a "?banner" hack of sorts - get the IP by some other means.
Which is not to say we should be significantly less concerned. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 13:11, Henning Thielemann > <lemm...@henning-thielemann.de> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Andrew Butterfield wrote: >>> >>> Just add ?banner=none to the url if you really have to read the page >> >> >> Maybe the intention was to demonstrate that censorship (in this case >> self-censorship) is mostly a problem for average users but not for advanced >> users. > > > There isn't going to be a disable-javascript or ?banner hack when anyone > anywhere can force a website to be redirected to some DOJ page without > providing any proof. (Yes, really.) > > -- > brandon s allbery allber...@gmail.com > wandering unix systems administrator (available) (412) 475-9364 vm/sms > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
