On 12 December 2011 22:39, Antoine Latter <[email protected]> wrote:
> But now they look as if they are of equal importance with the other
> class methods, which is not really true.

Maybe, but something like this is best fixed by improving
documentation, not by shuffling things around and needlessly breaking
APIs.  I also agree that if an Alternative instance doesn't make sense
it should be removed.   The current documentation is indeed very terse
indeed.  In particular it needs a section on the pitfalls that users
are likely to run into (like infinite loops).

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to