On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:17, Paolo G. Giarrusso <[email protected]>wrote:
> First, thanks to you and everybody for the alternative. But I'm still > convinced that the syntax is supposed to work, and you're just > workarounding the bug. > Hm, I think we have differing expectations; the syntax everyone presented is the one that is normally used for such things in ghci, and while perhaps the one you tried is supposed to work, it's a bit unusual and therefore probably not very well tested.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
