Does it have an obvious default implementation, bearing in mind it we might really want a total function?
sconcat [] = error "Yikes - I wish this was total!" sconcat [a] = a sconcat (a:as) = a <> sconcat as Best wishes Stephen On 3 May 2011 12:12, Yitzchak Gale <g...@sefer.org> wrote: [SNIP] > It has the obvious default implementation, > but allows for an optimized implementation for > specific instances. That turns out to be something > that comes up all the time (at least for me) in > real life. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
