On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 14:06, Johan Tibell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Michael Snoyman <[email protected]> wrote: >> What's the advantage to moving in into binary as opposed to bytestring? > > To test that the implementation can indeed be ported to that > interface. We could of course skip that step if we want to.
blaze-builder already implements the "binary" builder interface, minus the putWord* functions. I think those would be trivial to reimplement on top of Write. Since it sounds like everyone agrees with / has already thought of moving Builder into bytestring, I'll start poking at a patch. Who is the current patch-reviewer for binary and bytestring? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
