-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/15/10 06:41 , Daniel Fischer wrote: > play a role. Since ghc fares pretty well on 64-bit linux (David Terei and > Don), both, via the NCG and via C, it seems its 64-bit code generator is > better than its 32-bit code generator :(
amd64 has more registers; IIRC ghc needs a *lot* of registers to play with to perform well (TBH *everything* does), so x86 is always going to be behind the curve. - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] [email protected] system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [email protected] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkySRUMACgkQIn7hlCsL25XG5QCfWOqBnm/jwFXM9L5cDU33yJiO JYQAoLnytUMIZ2XHuWKcnin7fEWJk66u =0FBK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
