On 2 August 2010 14:59, Lyndon Maydwell <maydw...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's true I suppose, although since there are no implicit parameters > in haskell, it really has to be a DSL in implementation, rather than > just theory right?
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.2/html/users_guide/other-type-extensions.html#implicit-parameters You were saying? ;p -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
