On Sat, 17 Jul 2010, wren ng thornton wrote:
Niemeijer, R.A. wrote:
Here's my take on the new design:
Screenshot: http://imgur.com/9LHvk.jpg
Live version:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/623671/haskell_platform_redesign/index.htm
Is it just me, or does aligning [OSX,Win,Linux] `zip` [Comprehensive, Robust,
CuttingEdge] send the wrong message...
I found it rather conspicuous that all three of the items listed under
"cutting edge" (multicore parallelism, thread sparks, and transactional
memory) fell into concurrency/parallelism category. I'm not saying it's
a problem, or that I have a better idea, but are we conscious that
we're doing it, and is it what we want?
Friendly,
--Lane
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
