Stephen Tetley <stephen.tet...@gmail.com> writes: > On 3 July 2010 14:00, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So this argument isn't valid ;-) > > I think it was Hugs compliant as least for some revisions - I seem to > remember looking at it before I switched to GHC.
Actually, how would you call it in Hugs? Just start it explicitly with the -98 flag? These modules currently don't load by default in ghci, since all the extensions are specified in the cabal file rather than in the source files with LANGUAGE pragmas. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
