I understand that this becomes less of an issue when > you become more experienced with haskell. Still it will always be a good > way > to promote haskel-style solutions. >
I dunno, John uses noweb to good effect. Things like import statements along with the function definition are pretty nice and not achievable with Literate Haskell. > > I don't have any problems with LaTeX, but a less verbose solution would do > just fine. > You don't really need to know a lot of LaTex to use noweb. I'm no LaTex expert and I found the source easy to read. > My biggest problem is actually literate programming in conjunction with > leksah. Can anybody comment on this issue? Do you guys use leskah at all? > Unfortunately literate programming doesn't really have the tool support yet. I use emacs for Haskell development and loading Haskell code in to the REPL will be an issue if you're editing a noweb file. Currently this is the only thing keeping me from starting a large (> 2000 LOC) literate project -deech > > -- > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
