By the way, I do not know the GHC API well enough to say if it is possible to embed a super small bytecode interpreter, but :
- If it is the case, then users who do not want to write scripts can use it. Others would want to compile haskell code, therefore they need GHC anyway. - If it is not, then a cool thing to do for the GHC team would be to add one ;-) In both cases, if someone on haskell-cafe knows the answer, could he write it on the wiki in the page about the ghc api ? Cheers, PE El 07/05/2010, a las 19:22, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH escribió: > On May 4, 2010, at 01:52 , Maciej Piechotka wrote: >> After change of file you have to wait a long time as it compiles and >> links with yi. On my system (1 GB of RAM taken by system + 1 GB 'free' + >> 2 GB swaps, x86-64) it could in some situations it caused OOM. I'd >> prefer if the code was interpreted by ghci instead of compiled by GHC in >> this case (it should be as fast as most of the code was compiled >> anyway). > > > On the one hand, this is doable with the GHC API. On the other, that more or > less means your program contains what amounts to a full copy of GHC. > > -- > brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com > system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu > electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
