I shouldn't have choosen Num for the constructor name, it led to confusions apparently. You can replace tha Num with anything you want, doesn't change the situation. I mean, it's not the problematic part.
Is there any news about the fix in the lexer? When can we use it? On 27 April 2010 00:52, Ivan Miljenovic <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 April 2010 02:15, Ozgur Akgun <[email protected]> wrote: > > data Expr = Num Int | Expr :+: Expr | Expr :-: Expr > > > > [snip] > > > > -- | If the input is 'Num' does magic, if it is ':+:' does even more > magic! > > someFunc :: Expr -> Expr > > > > In the output of this markup, the 'Num' is hyperlinked but the ':+:' is > not. > > I would hazard a guess that the Num hyperlink points to the Num > typeclass in the Prelude rather than your Num constructor. As for > your infix constructor, I have no idea. > > -- > Ivan Lazar Miljenovic > [email protected] > IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com > -- Ozgur Akgun
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
