On 27 April 2010 03:39, Louis Wasserman <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm a fan of making FGL more record-based, but definitely keeping the > inductive graph style.
Definitely. > My own biggest gripe with previous versions of FGL was that the graph > implementations were severely underoptimized. In particular, PatriciaTree > left open a lot of optimization. Wouldn't know much about the optimisation side of things; when I've used FGL graphs before they usually weren't the bottleneck in my program. > Ivan, would you like to set up a darcs repo for FGL-Prime or something at > code.haskell.org, and start cracking? I'm really excited for this project. Sure, let's take these preliminary discussions off-list. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic [email protected] IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
