> If this is to be used with QuickCheck maybe it should be named that way. Certainly worth considering. There seems to be no convenient way of renaming packages on Hackage though, is there?
I suppose it would be wrong/impossible to create an alias package (quickcheck-agata) with no modules, just a dependency on the primary package (Agata)? /Jonas 2010/4/18 Marc Weber <marco-owe...@gmx.de>: > If this is to be used with QuickCheck maybe it should be named that way. > eg quickcheck-agatath ? > > This way its found faster. > > Marc Weber > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
