On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:35 PM, Neil Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > > CML is indeed the library that has the most markedly different behaviour. > In Haskell, the CML package manages to produce timings like this for fairly > simple benchmarks: > > %GC time 96.3% (96.0% elapsed) > > I knew from reading the code that CML's implementation would do something > like this, although I do wonder if it triggers some pathological case in the > GC.
That result is peculiar. What are you doing to the library, and what do you expect happens? Since I have some code invested on top of CML, I'd like to gain a little insight if possible. -- J. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
