Sean Leather wrote:
I find myself often writing this pattern:
someFun x y z = ...
fun y z = runFun $ someFun someDefault y z
or, alternatively:
fun y = runFun . someFun someDefault y
I very often write this too (wanting function composition, but with a
two-argument function on the right hand side). The trick I picked up
from somewhere is to do:
fun = (runFun .) . someFun someDefault
I'm not too keen on that, as it seems clumsy. I often end up writing
the operator that you describe, but have never settled on a consistent
name (since the obvious one to me, (..), is taken).
Thanks,
Neil.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
