On 11/02/2010, at 05:03, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. > uvector is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and it's > really seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, would > you call the vector library good enough to use in production at the moment?
Yes, with the caveat that I haven't really used it in production code (I have tested and benchmarked it, though). BTW, I'll release version 0.5 as soon as get a code.haskell.org account and move the repo there. Roman > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:59 AM, stefan kersten <s...@k-hornz.de> wrote: > hi, > > i've been using the vector [1] library for implementing some signal processing > algorithms, but now i'd like to use the statistics [2] package on my data, > which > is based on the uvector [3] library. is there a (straightforward) way of > converting between vectors and uvectors, preferrably O(1)? > > thanks, > <sk> > > [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/vector > [2] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/statistics > [3] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/uvector > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
