leimy2k:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Jon Harrop <j...@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 02 February 2010 18:23:59 Serguey Zefirov wrote:
> > 2010/2/2 Jon Harrop <j...@ffconsultancy.com>:
> > > On Tuesday 02 February 2010 16:10:05 Serguey Zefirov wrote:
> > >> Actually, your solution with arrays is the most often occured
> solution
> > >> an imperative programmer will come with. It is simple but not
> scalable
> > >> and not particularly fast.
> > >
> > > What gave you that impression?
> >
> > Discussion in Russian Smalltalk User Group.
> > A solution in APL: http://catpad.net/michael/apl/
> > Some experience before (my own first implementation and some of my
> > friends).
> >
> > Or, you're asking about scalability and speed?
>
> I meant the scalability and speed. An imperative solution should be
> simpler, more scalable and faster than any purely functional solution.
>
> That's a pretty strange comment. Why do you think an imperative solution is
> simpler, faster and more scalable?
Don't feed the troll^[1]
-- Don
[1]. Top 10 signs you have a troll (pick any you think relevant)
-
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Protect_the_community/Notes#Identify_poisonous_people
- Conceit
+ won't engage/argue with other positions
+ makes sweeping claims. empty statements about a project's success
+ reopens topics from years ago
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
