On Stack overflow page Conal Elliot says: > Beware that denotational semantics has two parts, from its two founders > Christopher Strachey and Dana Scott: the easier & more useful Strachey part > and the harder and less useful (for design) Scott part. >
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1028250/what-is-functional-reactive-programming > Any more information on how the Scott version is different from Starchey? On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote: > http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1665#comment-55086 > <http://perlustration.blogspot.com/> Daryoush
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
