Gregory Crosswhite <[email protected]> wrote: > Out of curiosity, why would one want a "newtype" that were unwrapped > implicitly, rather than just using "type"?
One reason might be because you only switched from 'type' to 'newtype' so that you could write more refined Arbitrary instances for your QuickCheck tests. -Greg _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
