Excerpts from Twan van Laarhoven's message of Thu Nov 19 00:59:25 +0100 2009: > Levi Greenspan wrote: > > What's the status of the TDNR proposal [1]? Personally I think it is a > > very good idea and I'd like to see it in Haskell'/GHC rather sooner > > than later. Working around the limitations of the current record > > system is one of my biggest pain points in Haskell and TDNR would be a > > major improvement. Thus I wonder if someone is actively working on > > this proposal? > > The TDNR proposal really tries to do two separate things: > > 1. Record syntax for function application. > The proposal is to tread "x.f" or a variation thereof the same as "(f x)"
It is more like "(ModuleToGuess.f x)" than "(f x)". -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
