Hello David, Thursday, November 12, 2009, 10:22:41 AM, you wrote:
>> are you seen hugs, for example? i think that ghc is slow because it's >> written in haskell and compiled by itself > If I understood, Evan is interested in ideas to speed up compilation. > As far as I know, hugs is an interpreter, not a compiler. it's impossible to interpret haskell - how can you do type inference? hugs, like ghci, is bytecode interpreter. the difference is their implementation languages - haskell vs C -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[email protected] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
