On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 09:57:50PM -0700, Iavor Diatchki wrote: > (argh, sorry about that, I pressed something and gmail sent my > unfinished email!) > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Iavor Diatchki > <iavor.diatc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > It seems that the problem is the site is using GHC 6.6.1, and > > something was broken at the time (I have not looked into what that > > is). > > Here are the outputs that I get for the little example on the site > > that you posted: > > > > GHC 6.10.3 and C++: > > 03 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0141 1 > 03 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0142 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0141 2 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0142 2 > > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0142 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0143 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0144 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0145 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0146 1 > > With GHC 6.6.1: > 03 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0141 1 > 03 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0142 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0141 2 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0142 2 > > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0142 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0143 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0145 1 > 30 10103538 2222 1233 6160 0146 1 > > Note that in the second test case one line is missing, the one ending in 44. > > -Iavor
Hi Iavor, Sweet, it makes a lot of sense. I haven't tried to run this with ghc-6.6.1, though. Thank you for doing this. Just for curiosity I'll try to find out what exactly fails under 6.6.1, just in case anyone else run into the problem in future (as I don't think they will upgrade the ghc any time soon). I'll eventually ask them to upgrade the ghc version. Any recommendation about which version should I ask for? Thanks, -- ~dsouza yahoo!im: paravinicius gpg key fingerprint: 71B8 CE21 3A6E F894 5B1B 9ECE F88E 067F E891 651E _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
