Simon Michael <si...@joyful.com> writes: > I can give a +1 vote for the Hack api and related libs. (Jinjing Wang > is a one-man army.) Below hack you'll run happstack or another > web-serving lib. Above hack you might run some combination of loli, > maid, the hack middleware modules, hsp. > > The advantage is that changing the low-level server in future is a > matter of changing one or two lines; and the upper-level utilities > seem more usable to me than current happstack's.
The problem is that `hack` isn't documented at all and that prevents it from being in wide use. At least, when I started my web app, I preferred happstack, as low-level and documented API is better than high-level API without a little bit of documentation, examples and tutorials. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
