On May 27, 2009, at 1:49 AM, Conal Elliott wrote:
Hi Tom,
I've been working on another code-generating graphics compiler,
generating GPU code. As always, I run into the problem of efficient
common subexpression elimination. In Pan, Vertigo & Pajama, I used
lazy memoization, using stable pointers and weak references, to
avoid the worst-case-exponential behavior you mention below. I'm
now using a bottom-up CSE method that's slower and more complicated
than I'm going for.
What do you mean with `exponential behavior'? Exponential related to
what?
For my FRP EDSL to JavaScript (toy) compiler[1] I've been implementing
CSE as well. I traverses the expression tree recursively and creates
an small intermediate language containing id's (pointers) to
expressions instead of real sub-expressions.
Maybe (probably) I am very naive, but I think this trick takes time
linear to the amount of sub-expressions in my script. When using a
trie instead of a binary tree for the comparisons there should be no
more character (or atomic expression) comparisons that the amount of
characters in the script.
So the problem seems not to be CSE algorithm, but the fact that EDSL
itself tends to blow up because it is hosted in Haskell. Like Tom's
example:
> let d = Add c c
> e = Add d d -- "e" now as 16 leaf nodes.
But again, I might be missing some important point here.
What's your latest wisdom about CSE in DSELs?
Thanks, - Conal
On Thu, Feb 7, 2008 at 11:33 PM, Tom Hawkins <tomahawk...@gmail.com>
wrote:
...
--
Sebastiaan Visser
(warning: messy code)
[1]
http://github.com/sebastiaanvisser/frp-js/blob/b4f37d3b564c4932a3019b9b580e6da9449768a8/src/Core/Compiler.hs
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
