Can you expand on this a bit? I'm curious why you think this. On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Thomas Davie <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 12 Mar 2009, at 15:04, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > > At risk of becoming the most hated man in all Haskelldom, I'd like to >> suggest that the Haskell logo not use lambda symbols. Or at least not as >> the central element. Sorry, I know I'm late to the party, but the thing is >> there is nothing distinctive about lambda; it's common to all FPLs. >> Besides, Lisp/Scheme already have that franchise. >> >> What is distinctive about Haskell it's use of the monad. The Pythagorean >> monad symbol is wonderfully simple: >> > No, what's distinctive about Haskell is usually the abuse of the monad. > > Encouraging people to think Haskell is all about monadic programming even > more is a recipe for disaster. > > Just my 2ยข > > Bob_______________________________________________ > > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
