On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Cale Gibbard <[email protected]> wrote: > However, "Appendable" carries baggage with it which is highly > misleading. Consider, for instance, the monoid of rational numbers > under multiplication (which, by the way, is quite useful with the > writer transformed list monad for dealing with probabilities) -- you > can claim that multiplication here is a sort of "appending", perhaps, > but it's not really appropriate.
It's rather funny that there's a mathematical sense in which all monoid operations *are* appending. The free monoid on a set has appending as its operation, and the free monoid is initial in the category of monoids on that set (by definition), so all monoid operations are appending, modulo some equivalence relation. :) --Max _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
