On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 21:59 +0000, Thomas DuBuisson wrote: > > How does forcing them to learn proposed terminology such as `Appendable' > > help here? Learners of Haskell do still need to learn what the new word > > means. > > The contention is that 'Appendable' is an intuitive naming that people > will already have a rudimentary grasp of.
But this contention is false. jcc _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
