There's a thread at happs group about this with good answers http://groups.google.com/group/HAppS/browse_thread/thread/1031809dca26f349
My top post should probably have been a cc, apologies. Looks pretty likely that the issues are solvable. Grokking the answers now. thomas. 2008/10/6 Duncan Coutts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 15:57 -0700, Jason Dusek wrote: >> I don't want to be contrarian, but I guess I can't help >> myself. Does MACID have anything to say about failover and >> replication? Isn't that more important than volume? > > HAppS does failover and replication within a cluster. They're working on > sharding, but that's a good deal harder. > > Duncan > > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
