Hi, Marc Weber wrote:
> > Another question is why do you want to we replace RDBMS-es? > a) Speed. A simple HAppS state benchmark shows that inserting records > can be 10 times faster than MySQL > don't know wether its' because switching processes, parsing SQL queries ? You could try using prepared statements, see http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/4.1/prepared-statements.html . According to the article, this will save the parsing overhead but not the prepare-plan overhead. However, the article is about MySQL 4.1, so maybe newer versions of MySQL may only need to prepare the execution plan once. PostgreSQL seems to supports preparing both parse result and the prepare-plan result (see http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-prepare.html ). /Mads Lindstrøm > b) Type safety. HaskellDB is nice.. But it's limiting because you can't > optimize queries very well. > Having something (maybe completeley in mem as HAppS proposes it) beeing > as easy as Data.Map would be nice. > > Sincerly > Marc Weber > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
