On 01/04/2008, PR Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > If > f x = x > and > g y = y > then > f g x > returns an error because f takes only one argument. Why can't we have > function application implemented outwardly (inside-out). So > f g x would be applied with > gx first followed by its return value passed to f instead of putting > g x in brackets.
Think about this: map (+1) [1..10] What should it do? How about: f 1 2 3 Should that be f (1 (2 3)), or ((f 1) 2) 3? Jeremy _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
