On Jan 15, 2008 3:26 PM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. That's awesome. I guess if you do all the TODOs for Binary like > this, we should merge the code back in :)
Well, at the moment I'm pretty unhappy with the amount of code duplication required both within binary-strict and between binary and binary-strict. I think this code needs a whole lot of restructuring (maybe a bit of TH for generating the common bits). I'll get to that when it appears that the API seems reasonable. AGL -- Adam Langley [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.imperialviolet.org 650-283-9641 _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
