On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 16:10:15 +0200, Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It won't work because haskell functions can't have side-effects.
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say here.
Jules
What I am trying to say is:
- storing something to disk does not mean one must have a function to
convert that something to a Haskell String
- I want to be able to use a function defined in one process in other
process even if the two does not run at the same time
Cristian Baboi wrote:
But I guess it won't work because the compiler will optimize it and the
call will disappear.
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:58:53 +0200, Cristian Baboi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is how I want print to be in Haskell
print :: (a->b) -> (a->b)
with print = id, but the following "side effect":
- I want to call the print function today, and get the value tomorrow.
________ Information from NOD32 ________
This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail
Servers.
part000.txt - is OK
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
________ Information from NOD32 ________
This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail
Servers.
part000.txt - is OK
http://www.eset.com
________ Information from NOD32 ________
This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Servers.
part000.txt - is OK
http://www.eset.com
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
