On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, ChrisK wrote: > I look at it this way: Every person who adds Haskell, however shallowly, to > their repertoire acts as an example that may spur others to learn Haskell, > perhaps deeply. And that is a win not because of language chauvinism, but > because of concept chauvinism. I hope that a future "Next Big Popular > Language" > has most of the concepts that make Haskell interesting.
I'm sure this will happen, I even suspect, this already happened, but a language can become popular only if enough legacy of several languages and the problematic parts of Haskell 98 are included. :-) _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
