On Wednesday 19 September 2007, C.M.Brown wrote: > g is strict in its first argument. Declared in a let it would look like: > > f x = let g x = case x of > (Just y) -> y > Nothing -> error "Nothing" in g x > > Again, g must be strict in its first argument.
Actually, f x = let g (Just x) = x g Nothing = error "Nothing" in g x is a valid definition. A let expression can have multiple definitions just like a where clause. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe