| On that note, I've been finding GHC's type suggestions often worse
| than useless, and wish it wouldn't even bother to try -- even more
| confusing for new users to have the compiler suggest pointless things
| like declaring an instance of Num String or whatever. I'd prefer it
| if it could just tell me what *specific* part of an expression, which
| symbol even, the expected and inferred values differed. On the other
| hand, when trying to guess at operator precedence rules, the "applied
| to too many" and "applied to too few" errors are actually pretty handy.
It's difficult to make error messages helpful. The best improvement mechanism
I know is this:
when you come across a case where GHC produces an
unhelpful message, send it in, along with the program
that produced it,
AND
your suggestion for the error
message you'd like to have seen.
I don't promise instant action, but if you suffer in silence then nothing will
improve. Sending a message keeps it on our radar *and* provides an example to
motivate improvements. (Boiling the program down a bit is a help, so you don't
have to send a massive tarball.)
Another thing that can be worth a try is to try your boiled-down program with
Helium, whose error-message infrastructure has received much more conscious
design attention than GHC's.
Simon
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
