i interpret it as this:
all [ usage x > usage y || fun_to_talk_about x > fun_to_talk_about y
| let lang=[minBound .. maxBound] -- C++,Haskell,Java,etc.
, x<-lang
, y<-lang
, irc_channel_users x > irc_channel_users y
]- marc Am Dienstag, 21. August 2007 schrieb Albert Y. C. Lai: > Andrew Coppin wrote: > > ...does this mean Haskell is officially harder to understand than Lisp, > > Java, Perl and O'Caml? :-} > > > > (OTOH, does this mean Haskell is easier to understand than PHP or C++?) > > Or, Haskell is the easiest to understand of them all. > > Reason: Extremely large channel means so hard to understand that many > people want help. Extremely small channel means so hard to understand > that few people show interest. The middle-sized channel sits at the > sweet spot. > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
