David Roundy wrote:
The only cost is that
this syntax relies on the do notation, and thus makes the desugaring of
that do notation slightly more complicated when used.
If I understand correctly,
do
blah
f (do
foo
bar (<- action)
)
blah
has an ambiguity: which do-block is the action bound in? I can easily
imagine myself being frustrated at having to refactor my code if the
defined answer is not the one I want at the moment.
Isaac
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
