Derek Elkins wrote:
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 17:11 +0100, Andrew Coppin wrote:
I'm still really really fuzzy on why this exists...
What?
xmonad.
The reason I pointed it out is that it (a window manager) is something
one usually thinks of as being "nothing but IO", yet this is not at all
how xmonad is implemented.
Indeed it sure *looks* like it should be "all I/O"... ;-)
As for ease, it is shorter, more featureful, more robust, and was
implemented much quicker that it's "inspiration" dwm. It also seems
pretty popular for its age (not just in the Haskell community) as far as
minimalistic window managers go.
More... featureful...?
It's a minimalistic WM. It even says so on the tin. Either it's minimal
or it isn't...
As for "robust"... it tiles windows. What could possibly go wrong?
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
