Hi

I'm currently in the process of attempting to write such a thing...

Good luck! Haskell needs more implementations to retain its purity and
compatibility.


> What is the value of show [] ?

That is indeed a difficult point. Since I want an interpreter so I can
step through the code interactively, I was just going to make the
interpreter *ask* me which implementation to call...

Yuk! I couldn't think of a better answer, which is what stopped me
from writing such an evaluator.


On the other hand, parsing Haskell input is intractably hard. Whitespace
actually matters, which makes the program to parse Haskell horrendusly
complex. Several times I've been forced to give up due to the sheer
complexity of it all.

Why not just reuse the standard Haskell parser? Its in Hacle (google
keyword: Hacle) amongst other places. It parses all of Haskell, and is
pretty easy to use.

Thanks

Neil
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to