On 2/26/07, Alfonso Acosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The returned type is a StateT and the only way in which I succesfully managed to internally work with both State and StateT is converting from the former to the later one using this function (not elegant at all)
I may be missing something, but why are you using both State and StateT? Maybe I don't understand your code, but it seems like you could be using StateT everywhere you're currently using State. Also, your type signatures would be easier to read if you defined a type synonym for your instantiation of StateT, e.g.: type AlfonsoM s = StateT s IO () and then everywhere you write (StateT s IO ()) now, you could write (AlfonsoM s) instead. Cheers, Kirsten -- Kirsten Chevalier* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Often in error, never in doubt "...People who mind their own business die of boredom at thirty."--Robertson Davies _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
