On 12/12/06, Brian Hulley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neil Mitchell wrote:
> Maybe we
> should try and hijack the phrase functional programming - Haskell is
> just too similar to Pascal.

This reminds me of when I was getting an X-ray a few months ago and I struck
up a conversation with the radiologist who turned out to be an ex-computer
programmer so he asked what language I was using so I said "Haskell" and he
said something like "Oh yeah Pascal I know that..."

Perhaps we need a tutorial on how to pronounce the word "Haskell" so that it
doesn't sound like "Pascal" :-) (eg "Hiskeeeell")


Actually, the more I think of it, the more I think we should rename
the language altogether. It seems like people say "Haskell" with
stress on the first syllable if they were either on the committee or
learned it inside academia, and "Haskell" with stress on the second
syllable if they learned it from online sources. And we really don't
need more pronunciation-based class distinctions.

"Curry" would have avoided this problem.

Cheers,
Kirsten

--
Kirsten Chevalier* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Often in error, never in doubt
"It was cold in the house so I slept in my car / And I steamed up the windows,
then it started to rain / And I dreamed about sex and I dreamed about peppers /
Woke up doing 85 in the passing lane" -- Ed's Redeeming Qualities
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to