On 12/11/06, Andrew Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I'm not opposed at all to a written final form. I guess I just don't see that and using a wikibook to assist in our collaboration as mutually exclusive.
I think the confusion is my fault. I assumed that you (if it was you who originally used the word "wikibook"... it's been a long day) meant wikibook as in the Wikimedia Foundation Wikibooks site, but it seems you meant it as a generic term instead. Sorry.
Anyway, I'd love to help in any such project. By the way, I seem to be messing up the threads. What is considered the "correct" way to reply to a particular thread? I've been copying and pasting the subject line and writing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think if you're going to do that, you also need to copy the cross-reference headers, and I don't know if Gmail lets you do that. (I gave up on trying to make that work, and got out of digest mode :-) Cheers, Kirsten -- Kirsten Chevalier* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Often in error, never in doubt "If you try to solve a hard problem, the question is not whether you will use a powerful enough language, but whether you will (a) use a powerful language, (b) write a de facto interpreter for one, or (c) yourself become a human compiler for one." -- Paul Graham _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
